Updates:
Bush Administration Protects Blackwaters from Any Prosecution in Killing
of
16
Iraqi in September 16th Shooting Panic.
10/29/2007
- The State Department promised Blackwater USA bodyguards immunity from
prosecution in its
investigation of last month's deadly shooting of 17 Iraqi civilians. The immunity
deal has delayed a
criminal inquiry into the Sept. 16 killings and could undermine any effort to
prosecute security
contractors for their role in the incident that has infuriated the Iraqi government.
The Associated Press
has learned... Three senior law enforcement officials said all the Blackwater
bodyguards
involved both in the vehicle convoy and in at least two helicopters above
were
given the legal
protection as investigators from the Bureau of Diplomatic Security sought to find
out what happened.
The FBI took over the case early this month,
officials said, after prosecutors
in the Justice
Department's criminal division realized it could not bring charges against Blackwater
guards based on their
statements to the Diplomatic Security investigators.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/blackwater_prosecutions
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C) 2007 William Schmidt, Ph. D.
All Rights Reserved.
www.tigersoft.com
http://cagle.msnbc.com/art/GovWaste.asp
This Is Wrong. This Is Corrupt! This Is George Bush!
Billions and billion of dollars have been totally wasted in Iraq. I'm not talking
about
the stupidity of
making an unnecessary war against a country that did not attack us and did
not threaten us,
according to the Arms Inspectors on the ground at the time. No I'm talking about
the loss of 9
million $100 dollar bills that were shipped to Iraq directly from the NY Fed Reserve.
This money just
disappeared. Just gone without a trace. No accountability. No record
keeping.
Just gone.
And, of course, no one is talking. Think what $10 billion could do for an
education
program. Ten thousand more teachers could easily have been hired for a year.
The private company that Bush and his cronies hired "to
keep tabs on the outflow of
money existed
mainly on paper. Based in a private home in San Diego, it was a shell corporation
with no certified
public accountants. Its address of record is a post-office box in the Bahamas,
where it is
legally incorporated. That post-office box has been associated with shadowy
offshore
activities."
( http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/10/iraq_billions200710?printable=true¤tPage=all )
How much did they have to give Bush's political campaign to get this plum?
Someone will find
out. And I will certainly publish it here!
It is so nauseating. Bush has relied upon private contractors to a degree that
is
unprecedented in
our history, The resulting widespread fraud, theft and waste have
added many tens
of billions of dollars in cost to this war. We are all paying dearly
now as the US
Dollar declines and foreign capital takes over America. The National
Debt Crisis is
being postponed for the time being by the Federal Reserve's smoke
and mirrors now,
but wait until the next President takes office. And that new President
will be blamed!
That's been the plan all along, hasn't it, Mr. Ben.
Why won't Congress just stop giving Bush money? Clearly the
Constitution
requires them to stop such massive, wholesale theft and high Adminstration
connivance.
We will watch with interest to see what happens to Vermont Senator Leahy's
War Profiteering
Prevention Act of 2007 (S. 119)
Blackwater: Bush's New Praetorian Guard.
The way his polls are going, he'll certainly need them himself!
October
1, 2007 Congressional hearings disclosed NEW information:
:
(1) Blackwater has engaged in 195 escalation of force incidents
since 2005, an average of 1.4 per week, including over 160 incidents in which
Blackwater forces fired first;
(2) after a drunken Blackwatercontractor shot the guard of
the Iraqi Vice President, the State Department allowed the contractor
to leave Iraq and advised Blackwater on the size of the payment needed
to help them resolve this;
(3) Blackwater, which has received over $1 billion in federal contracts
since 2001, is charging the federal government over $1,200 per day for each
protective security specialist employed by the company.
Now we hear about the Iraq shootings of unchecked and
unaccountable
Blackwater,
a private army based in the swamps of North Carolina, that boasts it is richest,
best equipped and
best trained band of mercenaries in the world. They guard high ranking
US civilians in
Iraq. That is their stated mission. And they good at it. Too bad Iraqi
officials
are not under
their protection, too. They claim not to have lost a single US civilian under
their protection.
But at what cost? Congress needs to ask Blackwaters how many people they
have killed?
Who sets the standards they operate under? It is said Blackwater soldiers
have a free hand
in threatening and killing Iraqi people. A former Special Forces member
documented ( Washington
Times , October 6, 2003) that military contractors guarding ministries
on behalf of coalition
authorities repeatedly killed Iraqis --without punishment or inquiry.
What they do is mostly secret, unless their trigger happiness breaks cover and
they are publicly
spotlighted while standing over the bodies of innocent dead civilians
with their guns
smoking. Evidence is mounting that they show a reckless cowboy shooting
mentality rate that
would never be tolerate in the US Army.
-- This past month 11 innocent Iraqi civilians were killed in a shootout between
Blackwaters and Iraqi Security. The shooting stopped only when one of the
Blackwater
guard turned his gun on his colleagues and yelled "stop shooting. all
tolled, 43 civilians
were
shot by the Blackwaters. The
details show flagrant Blakwater cruelty. An innocent
woman as shot in the cross-fire. "As she struggled to her feet and took a step,
eyewitnesses
said that a Blackwater trained his weapon on her and shot her multiple times."
-- A Blackwater guard shot and killed an Iraqi driver in May near
the Interior Ministry.
-- A drunk Blackwater mercenary shot and killed an Iraqi guard last December, with
no provocation or reason. He
had boasted he was going to go out and kill someone. Then
he stmbled over to a section called "Little Venice" wher emany Iraqi officials
live. There
he had an argument with an Iraqi guard and shot him once in the chest and three times
in the back. Bush and Cheney ordered the State Department to advise
Blackwater on
how much to pay the family of the murdered Iraqi to keep them silent. The State
Department then arranged for the Blackwater employee to exit Iraq without facing
ANY consequences for his actions.
After each of these violent incidents - and there were 3 more this year - the
Blackwaters involved refused to divulge their names to or talk about the incidents with
Iraqi authorities. It is now reported
that "Iraqi authorities want the U.S. government to
sever all contracts in Iraq with Blackwater USA within six months. They also
want the
firm to pay $8 million in compensation to families of each of the 17 people killed when
its guards sprayed a traffic circle with heavy machine gun fire last month....The report
found that Blackwater guards also had killed 21 Iraqi civilians and wounded 27 in previous
shootings since it took over security for U.S. diplomats in Baghdad after the U.S.
invasion" ( See also http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20071018/wl_time/americasotherarmy
)
Blackwater president Erik Prince said "NO" to
Iraq about their arresting and trying
the Blackwaters responsible for the shooring and killing innocent civilians.
( http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071016/FOREIGN/110160089/1001
)
Bush Won't Let "Sovereign" Iraq Ban Blackwater.
Bush Won't Let Them Prosecute Blackwaters
And Bush Certainly Won't Give Them Control of Their Oil!
The Iraq Ministry of Interios
has cancelled Blackwater's license and said it would prosecute
the Blackwaters involved in
the September 2007 incident. US officials quickly explained that
they have so such authority.
Nor does the US government have any plans to turn over Blackwaters
who kill civilians to Iraq.
Small wonder the Iraq government is not respected in Iraq. It is not
sovereign. Without such
authority, it can not stop the civil war. So, despite Bush's rhetoric,
the US is not doing what is
really needed to stop the civil war. It is not getting out. It wants
control of the 11 trillion
dollars worth of crude oil not very far below the surface of Iraq!
Legally
the oil belongs to the Iraqi people.
MSNBC
reported on 2/17/2005: "After
the U.S. invasion of Iraq,
the United States
took control of all of the
Iraqi governments bank accounts, including the income from oil sales. The
United Nations approved the
financial takeover, and President Bush vowed to spend Iraqs money wisely.
But now critics are raising
serious questions about how well the United States handled billions of dollars in
Iraqi oil funds. Iraq's oil resources generate
billions of dollars money the United States promised to
protect after overthrowing
Saddam Hussein. Now, Frank Willis, a former senior American
official in Iraq,
tells NBC News the United
States failed to safeguard the oil money known as the
Development Fund
for Iraq.
"There was, in my mind, pervasive leakage in assets of Iraq, and to some extent,
those assets were
squandered," says
Willis. Willis helped run Iraqs Transportation
Ministry. He says government agencies
and private contractors had
to be paid in cash because Iraqs
banking system was decimated. "A lot of money
did get to the Iraqi people
at the grass-roots level, and a lot of it got into the wrong hands," he says. In one
photograph, Willis and
colleagues showed off a $2 million payment to a security contractor. "It was time for
payment," he remembers.
"We told them to come in and bring in a bag. It reminded me of the Wild West."
In a
series of reports on U.S. management of the oil money, auditors
working for the United Nation's Iraq
Advisory and Monitoring Board and
the Inspector General of the Coalition Provisional Authority found:
- Insufficient controls
- Missing records
- Two sets of books at Iraq's Finance Ministry,
which did not match
In one example of insufficient controls, the United
States stored hundreds of millions of oil dollars
in a vault in a Baghdad palace. Government auditors found that the key to the vault was
kept unsecured
in a U.S. officials backpack.Iraqs U.S.
administrator, Paul Bremer, pledged last year to hire a certified public accounting firm
to
ensure proper controls.
But the United States gave the contract not to an accounting firm but to a tiny
consulting company, Northstar which NBC News found is headquartered at a private
home near San Diego.
"They violated the rules. They
picked a contractor who didnt meet their requirements," says Paul Light,
a government contracting expert and professor at New York University.
Northstars president says the
Pentagon knew Northstar was not a certified public accounting firm and that
four experienced employees went to Iraq and did a good job.
However, one audit notes that a single Northstar employee maintained spreadsheets tracking
billions of dollars.
Bremer would not comment. His aides say Iraq is a war zone and
their top priority was getting money quickly
where it was needed, even if the accounting wasn't perfect. But NBC
News has learned that a draft government
audit faults the United States for inadequate stewardship of up to $8.8
billion in oil money,
handed over to Iraqs
ministries but never fully accounted for. "
BUSH SAYS "NO". Iraq Oil Is Not Their Oil To
Do Waht They Want.
During the run-up to the invasion of Iraq,
President Bush and his aides sternly dismissed suggestions that the
war was all about oil. "Nonsense," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld
declared. "This is not about that,"
said White House spokesman Ari Fleischer.
Now, more than 3 1/2 years later, someone else is asserting that the war is about oil
-- President Bush.
As he barnstorms across the country campaigning for Republican candidates in Tuesday's
elections, Bush
has been citing oil as a reason to stay in Iraq. If the United States pulled its troops
out prematurely and
surrendered the country to insurgents, he warns audiences, it would effectively hand over
Iraq's considerable
petroleum reserves to terrorists who would use it as a weapon against other countries.
"You can imagine a world in which these extremists and radicals got control of
energy resources," he said at a
rally here Saturday for Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-Colo.). "And then you can imagine
them saying, 'We're going
to pull a bunch of oil off the market to run your price of oil up unless you do the
following. And the following
would be along the lines of, well, 'Retreat and let us continue to expand our dark
vision.' "
Bush said extremists controlling Iraq "would use energy as economic
blackmail" and try to pressure the United
States to abandon its alliance with Israel.
At a stop in Missouri on Friday, he suggested that such radicals would
be "able to pull millions of barrels of oil off the market, driving the price up to
$300 or $400 a barrel."
Oil is not the only reason Bush offers for staying in Iraq, but his comments on the stump
represent another
striking evolution of his argument on behalf of the war. The slogan of "no blood for
oil" became a rallying cry
for antiwar activists prior to the March 2003 invasion and angered administration
officials. "There are certain
things like that, myths, that are floating around," Rumsfeld told Steve Kroft of CBS
Radio in November 2002.
"It has nothing to do with oil, literally nothing to do with oil."
In truth, even if Iraq did not sell oil to the United States, it would not matter as long
as it sold it to someone
because the international market is fungible and what counts is the overall supply and
overall demand, according to analysts. If Iraq cut off exports altogether, it still would
not have the dire effect on the world market that Bush
predicts, they said. The price of oil began rising dramatically in 2002 as the
confrontation with Iraq loomed,
but many factors contributed, including increasing demand by China
and problems in Nigeria, Venezuela
and
elsewhere. The world, in fact, has already seen what would happen if Iraqi oil were cut
off entirely, as Bush suggests
radicals might do. Iraq effectively stopped pumping oil altogether in the months
immediately after the invasion.
"They're a minor exporter," said Edward Morse, managing director and chief
energy economist at Lehman Brothers. "They have potential to be a greater exporter.
But it's ludicrous to suggest someone could hold the world hostage by withholding oil from
the market, especially a regime that needs money."
(Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/04/AR2006110401025.html
)
The Bush
administration is pressuring the Iraq government to sell off their oil reserves.
If they do this
they will have no moral authority at home. And so, Bush again shows he is
encouraging the civil war,
not ending it. And with his oil lust America pays a higher and higher price for its
occupation.
.
Blackwater
CEO, Erik Prince - "I believe we acted appropriately at all times."
Erik Prince is a former Navy Seal. He is the son of a very wealthy Michigan
businessman.
He interned with Bush Sr. He and his family have given over $2 million dollars to
Republican candidates. This has bought him much entre into the Bush Adminstration.
War profiteering by Prince and Blackwater are the subject of a Video you can see at
this
link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-greenwald/erik-prince-blackwater-w_b_30235.html
Erik Prince's Biography
He attended the United States Naval Academy after high school,[4]
but left the Academy after
a short time, and ultimately graduated from Hillsdale
College. He was an intern in the White House
under President George H. W. Bush.[5] After college,
he earned a commission
in the United States Navy
after joining in 1992 via Officer Candidate School. He served as a Navy SEAL officer on deployments
to Haiti, the Middle East and
the Mediterranean,
including Bosnia. When his father, Edgar,
unexpectedly died in 1995, Prince ended his Navy service prematurely. Prince's mother,
Elsa, sold the
family's automobile
parts company, Prince Corporation, for $1.3 billion to Johnson
Controls, Inc.
Now a billionaire, Prince moved to Virginia Beach and personally financed the formation
of Blackwater
USA in 1997.[4][6]
Prince serves as Vice President of the Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation which gives
money to
organizations of the Christian right. Salon
reports that "between July 2003 and July 2006, the foundation
gave at least $670,000 to the Family Research Council and $531,000 to Focus
on the Family"[10]
headed
by James Dobson.
Prince's Campaign Contributions
to Republicans since 2000
Since 1998, Prince has personally donated over $200,000 to Republican causes.[11][12
His contributions to various Republican Committes stand out.
(Rep Congressional Committee = RCC)
7/26/2007 $20,000 RCC
8/5/2005 $25,000 RCC
7/14/2004 $25,000 RCC
10/15/03 $2,000 - Bush/Cheney
1/30/01 $3,950 - Rep Natl State Elections Comm.
1/30/01 $20,000 - Rep. Natl Comm.
10/4/00 $68,000 Rep Natl State
Election Comm.
Republican Congressmen who got more than $2000 include:
James Talent, Jon Ky, George Allen, Mike Pence ($3,000), Tom Delay $(3,100),
Rich Santorium, Abe Spencer ($2,000)
========================== Details of Campaign Contrinutions
===========================================
Contributor |
Candidate or PAC |
Amount |
Date |
Prince, Erik Mr.
McLean , VA 22102
Self/Business Owner |
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE (R) |
$20,000
primary |
07/27/07 |
PRINCE, ERIK
MC LEAN, VA 22102 |
TALENT,
JAMES MATTHES (R)
Senate - MO
TALENT FOR SENATE COMMITTEE |
$2,100
general |
09/19/06 |
PRINCE, ERIK
MC LEAN, VA 22102
PRINCE HOUSEHOLD/FOUNDER |
KYL,
JON (R)
Senate - AZ
JON KYL FOR U S SENATE |
$2,100
primary |
08/23/06 |
PRINCE, ERIK
MCLEAN, VA 22102
PRINCE HOUSEHOLD LLC/PARTNER |
ALLEN,
GEORGE (R)
Senate - VA
FRIENDS OF GEORGE ALLEN |
$2,100
general |
08/22/06 |
Prince, Erik Mr.
McLean, VA 22102
Prince Household LLC |
GREEN PARTY OF LUZERNE COUNTY PA (GRE) |
$5,000
primary |
07/21/06 |
PRINCE, ERIK MR.
MC LEAN, VA 22102
THE PRINCE GROUP/OWNER |
AMERICA'S FOUNDATION |
$1,000
primary |
05/08/06 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Prince Household LLC/partner |
PENCE,
MIKE (R)
House (IN 06)
MIKE PENCE COMMITTEE |
$1,000
general |
01/04/06 |
Prince, Erik
McLean, VA 22102
Prince Group/Chairman |
PRINCIPLES EXALT A NATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE |
$1,000
primary |
01/04/06 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Prince Household LLC/partner |
PENCE,
MIKE (R)
House (IN 06)
MIKE PENCE COMMITTEE |
$2,000
primary |
12/19/05 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Prince Household Group/Executive |
SAXTON,
H. J (R)
House (NJ 3)
FRIENDS OF JIM SAXTON |
$1,000
primary |
10/31/05 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Prince Household LLC/Partner |
DELAY,
THOMAS DALE (R)
House (TX 22)
TOM DELAY CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE |
$2,100
primary |
09/26/05 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Prince Household Group/Executive |
SAXTON,
H. J (R)
House (NJ 3)
FRIENDS OF JIM SAXTON |
$500
primary |
09/26/05 |
Prince, Erik Mr.
McLean, VA 22102
Self/Business Owner |
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE (R) |
$25,000
primary |
08/05/05 |
PRINCE, ERIK
MC LEAN, VA 22102
THE PRINCE GROUP |
SANTORUM,
RICHARD J (R)
Senate - PA
SANTORUM 2006 |
$2,100
primary |
06/23/05 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Blackwater USA |
TIAHRT,
TODD W. (R)
House (KS 04)
TIAHRT FOR CONGRESS |
$1,000
primary |
03/31/05 |
Prince, Erik D.
Mc Lean, VA 22102
SELF EMPLOYED/BUSINESS OWNER |
HOEKSTRA,
PETER (R)
House (MI 02)
PETER HOEKSTRA FOR CONGRESS |
$1,000
primary |
03/31/05 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Prince Household LLC/Partner |
DELAY,
THOMAS DALE (R)
House (TX 22)
TOM DELAY CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE |
$1,000
general |
11/16/04 |
Prince, Erik
McClean, VA 22102
owner/prince household |
MUSGRAVE,
MARILYN (R)
House (CO 04)
MUSGRAVE FOR CONGRESS |
$1,000
general |
11/10/04 |
Prince, Erik D. Mr.
McLean, VA 22102
The Prince Group/Executive |
JONES,
WALTER B (R)
House (NC 03)
WALTER JONES FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE (2008) |
$750
general |
11/02/04 |
Prince, Erik Mr
Mclean, VA 22102
Prince Household LLC/Partner |
LEWIS,
JERRY (R)
House (CA 41)
LEWIS FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE |
$1,000
general |
11/02/04 |
PRINCE, ERIK
MCLEAN, VA 22102
PRINCE HOUSEHOLD LLC |
COBURN,
THOMAS A (R)
Senate - OK
COBURN FOR SENATE COMMITTEE |
$1,000
general |
11/02/04 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102 |
POE,
TED (R)
House (TX 2)
POE FOR CONGRESS |
$750
general |
10/29/04 |
Prince, Erik
McLean, VA 22102
Prince Group/Blackwater/CEO |
BURNS,
O MAXIE (R)
House (GA 12)
MAX BURNS FOR CONGRESS |
$1,000
general |
10/29/04 |
Prince, Erik
Mc Lean, VA 22102
Prince Group/CEO |
HUNTER,
DUNCAN (R)
House (CA 52)
COMMITTEE TO RE-ELECT CONGRESSMAN DUNCAN HUNTER |
$1,000
general |
10/29/04 |
PRINCE, ERIK
MCLEAN , VA 22102
PRINCE HOUSEHOLD LLC/PARTNER |
DEMINT,
JAMES W (R)
Senate - SC
DEMINT FOR SENATE COMMITTEE INC |
$1,000
general |
10/29/04 |
Prince, Erik D.
Mc Lean, VA 22102
SELF EMPLOYED/BUSINESS OWNER |
HOEKSTRA,
PETER (R)
House (MI 02)
PETER HOEKSTRA FOR CONGRESS |
$1,000
general |
08/24/04 |
Prince, Erik Mr.
McLean, VA 22102
The Prince Group/President |
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE (R) |
$25,000
primary |
07/14/04 |
Prince, Erik Mr.
Mc Lean, VA 22102
The Prince Group/CEO |
AMERICA'S FOUNDATION |
$1,000
primary |
05/06/04 |
PRINCE, ERIK D MR.
MC LEAN, VA 22102
PRINCE GROUP/CEO |
BUSH,
GEORGE W (R)
President
BUSH-CHENEY '04 (PRIMARY) INC |
$2,000
primary |
10/15/03 |
Prince, Erik Mr.
Mc Lean, VA 22102
The Prince Group/CEO |
NATIONAL CONSERVATIVE CAMPAIGN FUND |
$500
primary |
09/19/03 |
Prince, Erik D. Mr.
McLean, VA 22102
The Prince Group/Executive |
JONES,
WALTER B (R)
House (NC 03)
WALTER JONES FOR CONGRESS COMMITTEE (2008) |
$1,000
primary |
03/18/02 |
PRINCE, ERIK D
CODY, WY 82414
THE PRINCE GROUP |
RNC REPUBLICAN NATIONAL STATE ELECTIONS COMMITTEE (soft-money donation) |
$3,950
primary |
01/30/01 |
PRINCE, ERIK
CODY, WY 82414
THE PRINCE GROUP |
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE (R) |
$20,000
primary |
10/30/00 |
PRINCE, ERIK
CODY, WY 82414 |
RNC REPUBLICAN NATIONAL STATE ELECTIONS COMMITTEE (soft-money donation) |
$68,000
primary |
10/04/0 |
(
Source: http://www.newsmeat.com/ceo_political_donations/Erik_Prince.php
)
=====================================================================================
Blackwater: A Dagger Pointing at The Heart of
American Democracy
Why do we even need a Blackwater? Why can't out own military protect us? Why
is money spent on private contractors rather than US soldiers? The answer is that
Bush
has received a lot of campaign contributions from folks who want him to throw them
a lot of no-bid big contract business. That is the case with Blackwater.
Eisenhower, we all know, warned of a growing Military Industrial Complex. Did you
know that Lincoln threatened to hang war time profiteers in the Civil War? He
considered
them "worse than traitors". In World War II, FDR spoke out against "war
millionaires"
who made excessive profits exploiting the calamity of war. President Truman, when he
served in the Senate, traveled across the country holding now-famous public hearings
which expose gross fraud, waste and abuse by military contractors.
Here's a question. How can a company that gets rich from war
and its connections within the Administration correctly boast that they ARE
capitalists? It beats me. It's just like the Chicken-Hawks, who boast
they are
Pro-Military but never themselves served. It is Socialism for the Military.
It is pure GRAFT! Bush is paying them back for their campaign contributions.
And they are being made rich at the expense of everyone else to pays the bill
for Bush's war.
Surely, the central tendency of the last seven years has been
that the Bush Adminstration has served his biggest campaign contributors very
well. (Look at what I wrote about the mutually profitable ties between him and
Philip Morris.) With Bush, many of the biggest contracts were made without
competitive bidding. This is totally corrupt, immoral and an impeachable offense.
Legal
redress against excessive wartime profiteering doe sexist now. The Bush
Adminstration just has no interest in pursuing it.
What's Worse?
Blackwater has claimed the privilege of the prostitute
throughout
the Ages: Power without Responsibity or Accountability! It is unclear that Blackwater is
responsible to anyone.
They are above law and
justice in Iraq. In
2004, U.S.-appointed occupation
governor, Bremer signed Order 17, which made U.S. contractors immune from
"arrest, detention or legal proceedings in Iraqi courts."
They are not subject to military law or discipline.
They often lord it over US soldiers
in Iraq. Many are paid nearly $1,000 a day. They
do not coordinate with US forces
unless they find it convenient. They are above military law? They cannot be
court
martialed? A new law does apply to civilians who "serve with" or
"accompany" US
"armed forces in the field". But the Blackwaters serve as guards to civilians or
act
very independently of the army.
They are not presently suject
to the FBI or the Department of Justice for their
misconduct in Iraq.
To charge Blackwater or its employees for a criminal act that occurred in
Iraq, the case would have to fall under the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
Act: a prosecution
would only be permitted if Blackwater was "supporting the mission of the Department
of Defense overseas." In the recent cases of misconduct, Blackwater's
primary mission
was to protect State Department officials.
The US Has Violated The
Geneva Conventions
The Geneva Conventions make hired mercenaries illegal. So, Bush claims that they
are not in
the battle zones to actually fight or assassinate. They are only in Iraq for
"security"
or
"training" or (perhaps) "guarding food shipments." There
are probably 1,000 Blackwaters
in Iraq
now, though Congress is having a hard time finding this out. They have received
$1,000,000,000 by the Adninstration since 2001.
Blackwater serves many useful purposes for an Administration that wishes to
conceal its
illegal actions, threaten its own enemies or extend its power. The more diabolical
it plans,
the more it will need private armies for hire like Backwater. Blackwater should
be made
illegal!
1) The U.S. government does not count mercenaries as their
soldiers, and it does not count
dead mercenaries as military casualties. In other words, using mercenaries means the
Pentagon can downplay the size of its involvement. The public has no way of knowing
how many Blackwater mercenaries have been killed or wounded. Or how their families
stateside are treated if they are killed.
2) The U.S. government is
involved in growing numbers of "under the radar" interventions
and mini-wars all over the world. Efforts to unseat Chavez in Venezuela are of that
type.
Using mercenaries to carry out these operations enables the U.S. government to keep
"plausible deniability" in the violation of sovereignty and the commitment of
atrocities.
3) The third advantage is that Blackwater
gives the US military officers and experts a
very lucrativesourve of future income, when they quit the service. US Ex-military
personnel
are welcomed into Blackwater. They can use their in-house contacts to win massive
contracts for Blckwater in logistics, training, and special operations. Blackwaters
can become millionaires, even while continuing their former military assignments
"in the private sector".
4) Blackwater operations are far outside the usual budgetary and political
scrutiny. It is
almost impossible for Congress to figure out how much they are paid and what they
are doing.
Black Water and New
Orleans
Sept 10, 2005 - "New
Orleans - Heavily armed paramilitary mercenaries from the Blackwater
private security ... are openly patrolling the streets of New Orleans. Some of
the mercenaries say they
have been "deputized" by the Louisiana governor; indeed some are wearing gold
Louisiana state
law enforcement badges on their chests and Blackwater photo identification cards on their
arms.
They say they are on contract with the Department of Homeland Security and have been given
the authority to use lethal force...
"Blackwater mercenaries
are some of the most feared professional killers in the world
and they are accustomed to operating without worry of legal consequences. Their presence on
the streets of New Orleans should be a cause for serious concern for the remaining
residents of the
city and raises alarming questions about why the government would allow men trained to
kill
with impunity in places like Iraq and Afghanistan to operate here."
(Source: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/091005A.shtml
)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BUSH LIED. HE DID APPROVE ILLEGAL
TORTURE
The New York Times today (10/4/2007) reported that in 2005,
soon after the US Justice
Department and Bush publicly condemned torture as "abhorrent" and denied that
the US
engages in torture, the Bush Administration secretly approved the harshest
interrogation
techniques ever used by the CIA/ White House spokesperson Dana Perino lied again,
saying, it is the US policy not to engage in torture (What was Anu Grave all
about?).
Bush authorized, through his willing Attorney General, interrogators
"to barrage prisoners
with a combination of excruciatingly painful physical and psychological tactics.
They lie
because they are embarrassed. Now Bush's torturers deny that head slapping,
water-boarding,
drowning simulation, standing and awake for long hours and being kept very cold are not
torture. They are the first that would cry "foul" if it was done them!
"In 2004,
there was a minor revolt in the
Justice Department. A conservative law professor, Jack Goldsmith, took a job as a
legal adviser to the
general counsel of the Pentagon. Nine months later he resigned. He had fought to change
the Bush
Administraton's wish to use torture. But he quit. He said
he was worn out. I was disgusted with the
whole process and fed up
and exhausted, Alberto Gonzales came in soon after as attorney general with
the mandate of bringing the department back in line with the White House and to
make sure such
dissention would not happen again. Shane says the CIA eventually stopped using some
of the harshest
interrogation techniques, including waterboarding (because they do not work).
However these techniques
are still considered legal under Justice Department legal interpretations."
Torture does not work! The person tortured just says whatever he thinks will get the
pain to stop.
So why do the Bush Administration still want to use torture? BECAUSE BUSH IS
A CERIFIABLE
SADIST. He tortured little frogs as a kid. He branded fraternity pledges. He
relished executing
a record number of Texas inmates and smirked when asked about one of them begging for
mercy.
It is amazing that the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi have taken IMPEACHMENT off the table.
If it is not used against George Bush, the US Constitution is a fraud to Democrats, too.
Blackwater
Wants to Build A Training Center in San Diego County
The
proposed site is 42 miles east of
San Diego. Sierra Club and Anti-War activists are conducting educational activities.
( http://www.sdcpj.org/ )
Other Private Para-Mailitary Contractors Not
under US Conbtrol
10/18/2007
"Guns for Hire. Blackwater has more than
1,000 men under arms in Iraq, but it is just
one of dozens of security companies there. Across the
country, there are now anywhere from
20,000 to 30,000 armed contractors, many of them performing duties that in
previous conflicts
were the domain of uniformed soldiers...Some security convoys keep a low profile, using
cars and
dress that blend into the bustling streets of the city. Others - especially Blackwater - "roll
heavy" in
large convoys of big, armored SUVs, driving aggressively to keep a 100-ft. (about 30 m)
bubble
of space around the client at all times, intended to ward off suicide car bombers. To
maintain that
bubble, convoy drivers bump other cars off the road, and gunners fire shots into
radiators. Iraqi
drivers have learned from painful experience to stay well clear of convoys, but in crowded
Baghdad
streets it's not always possible to swerve out of the way. All too often, accidents turn
fatal. (There
are no reliable statistics on the number of Iraqis killed or hurt in such incidents.).///
"Some security men carry the aggression too far, treating all the Iraqis they
encounter as potential enemies,
using hostile body language and verbal abuse - and sometimes worse. Many uniformed
American
soldiers regard the contractors with disdain, describing them as reckless and
trigger-happy. Since
Iraqis don't always distinguish between private and military convoys, soldiers say, bad
behavior by
contractors only deepens Iraqi antagonism toward the military. "The contractors
caused problems
that the Iraqi leaders - imams, tribal sheiks, elected officials, military commanders -
expected the
U.S. [military] to solve," says retired Army Major General John Batiste, who
commanded the
1st Infantry Division in Iraq in 2004 and '05. "Their attitude was, They're Americans
and therefore
they work for you...a senior Western diplomat told TIME he was especially alarmed by the
attitude
of the men guarding senior U.S. embassy officials. "They behave
like Iraq is the Wild West and Iraqis
are like 'Injuns,' to be treated any way they like," he said, asking to remain
anonymous because of the
sensitivity of inter-embassy relations. "They're better-armed and -armored than the
military, but they
don't have to follow military rules, and that makes them dangerous." The men he was describing
worked for Blackwater...
"No serious attempt was made to rein in Blackwater until the Sept. 17
shootings. When the Iraqi
government temporarily rescinded the firm's gun permits, it forced the embassy to cancel
all convoys
into the Red Zone. As a compromise, the embassy announced that all future Blackwater
convoys
will include video cameras and a diplomatic-security
agent to keep a close watch on the contractors.
Some U.S. Congressmen have proposed legislation to close the legal loopholes that exempt
contractors
from Iraqi and American laws."
( http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20071018/wl_time/americasotherarmyy
)
And There Are Still More Killed Recently by These Hired Guns
10/18/2007
"KIRKUK, Iraq (AFP) - Guards from a private security company opened fire Thursday on a taxi that
approached their convoy near the Iraqi city of Kirkuk wounding three civilians, including a woman journalist,
police said. "I saw a convoy of three cars pass a taxi and one of the guards
took his weapon and opened
fire on the taxi," said police officer Hussain Rashid. "I tried myself to stop
the convoy but they didn't pay
attention to me. They stopped about 300 metres from the scene, then they moved," he
added.
Finally, The New York Times reported that US Secretary of
Defence Robert Gates wants all
armed security contractors working for the US government in Iraq to be brought under a single,
possibly military command." That
they have not been under strict military control along is
ludicrously derilect.
( http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071018/wl_mideast_afp/iraqunrestguards
)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Much Bigger Danger:
Learn from History. Blackwater Is AThreat To America!
What
Bush is doing to America is wrong. .
It is deadly dangerous It
reminds me of Hitler's Brown Shirts. If we think it cannot happen here,
it most certainly can!
In 1935 America's famour novelist, Sinclair Lewis penned a novel by the
name: "It
Can't Happen Here." In it a right-wing
populist-pretending president destroys civil
liberies and sets up a fascist state.
He is advised by a diabolically clever and cynical political
strategist and is backed by some
hypocitical religious fundamentalists.
James Madison warned that war empowers the President with all the means of
seducing the minds . . . of the people.
"Of all the enemies to public liberty war
is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it
comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from
these proceed
debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing
the
many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the
Executive is
extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors, and emoluments is multiplied; and
all the
means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people....
[There is also an] inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of
a state
of war, and ... degeneracy of manners and of morals.... No nation could preserve its
freedom in
the midst of continual warfare...
"A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe
companions
to liberty. The means of defence agst. foreign danger, have been always the
instruments of
tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a
revolt
was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending,
have enslaved the people." (Quoted from: http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd0409a.asp )
His words were prophetic. Presidents and Senators have all too often put
themselves above the law when they could stir up enough fear:
1798 Alien and Sedition
Acts
Lincolns Civil War suspension
of habeas corpus
1919-1921 Red Scare Palmer Raids
Internment of Japanese
in World War II
1954 McCarthys
witch-hunt of the State Department
Richard Nixons many abuses of power: political break-ins, spying,
using
IRS
against political "enemies"
during the war in Vietnam and extorting
campaign
contributions.
In
1848, a year after the Mexican War had been declared, Illinois
Congressmen Lincoln excoriated President Polk for
wantonly starting a war with Mexico. On Dec. 22,
1847, a few days after he took his House seat, Lincoln introduced
eight resolutions asking the President to inform
the Congress bout the "spot" on which "the
blood of our citizens was shed." Wasn't it first Spanish, then Mexican
territory, always occupied by Mexican farmers and never by
Texans? And wasn't the first American blood shed, that
of soldiers, who invaded from Texas after Gen. Zachary Taylor had
repeatedly said "that in his opinion no such
movement was necessary to the defense or protection of
Texas"? Lincoln risked his career when he laid bare
the false pretexts for the
Mexican War; he resisted the deluded war-mad public opinion. Though he lost public
office and favor for a while, his political
courage paved the way for his later election as President.
(Source: http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2909lincoln_iraq.html
Lincoln said: "All this shows that the President is, in
no wise, satisfied with his own positions.
First he takes up one,
and in attempting to argue us into it, he argues himself out of it; then seizes another,
and goes through the
same process; and then, confused at being able to think of nothing new, he snatches
up the old one again,
which he has some time before cast off. His mind, tasked beyond it's power, is running
hither and thither,
like some tortured creature, on a burning surface, finding no position, on which it can
settle
down, and be at ease."(Quoted
from: http://www.mahablog.com/oldsite/id6.html
)
Thugs
Hired by Hitler
In 1920, Hitler ostensibly organized a band of ex-soldiers and private right wing
armysoldiers (Freikorps) to protect him when he
spoke at public meetings, but they also carried
out many acts of street violence against their
political opponents. They were called the Sturm
Abteilungen (Storm Troopers). Their numbers
grew by the thousands. They wore grey jackets,
brown shirts, swastika armbands, ski-caps,
knee-breeches and combat boots. Carrying swastika
flags, they paraded through the streets of
Munich until Hitler would deliver a diatribe that
encouraged his supporters to carry out acts of
violence against Jews and his political opponents.
They bestowed military like ranks and titles on their
members. By 1931, before Hitler took
power, it had 170,000 members! After taking power, Hitler felt so threatened by their
independent power, that he arrested and executed
their leadership in mid 1934.
I grew up in Cincinnati. Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (519 BC) was regarded
by the Romans as one of the heroes of early Rome and as a model of Roman virtue and
simplicity. As a persistent opponent of the plebeians, he resisted the proposal of Terentilius to
draw up a code of written laws applicable equally to patricians and
plebeians. He lived in
humble circumstances, working on his own small farm. The statue of him I remember
has the inscription:
"With one hand he returns the fasces, symbol of power
as appointed dictator of Rome. His other hand holds the
plow, as he resumes the life of a citizen and farmer."
"Cincinnatus's first term
as dictator began when the Aequi
tribe from the east and the Volscians
from the southeast began to menace Rome. The Roman Senate
pleaded with Cincinnatus to assume the mantle of dictator to save the city.
"According to Roman analysts, Cincinnatus had settled into a life of farming and knew
that his departure might mean starvation for his family if the crops went unsown in his absence. He
assented to the request anyway and within sixteen days had defeated
the Aequi and the Volscians.
His immediate resignation of his absolute authority with the end of the crisis has often
been cited as an example of good leadership, service to the public good, civic virtue, and
modesty. He came out of retirement again during his second term as dictator (439 BC) to put down a revolt
by the plebeians.
After the war Cincinnatus left the job and picked back up where he left off, working at a
farm."
( Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cincinnatus
) |
|
|